Page 1 of 2

Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 3:31 pm
by chex
Hello, Wolfe! :lol: :<3:

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 3:51 pm
by Wolfe
Hello!

I think you guys already know my stance on this one.

Of course, in case you don't, "legos" IS NOT A WORD! LEGO is the company.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 9:05 pm
by LaLou
Neither.


Building bricks.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 9:43 pm
by bella
Legos ftw.

Image

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 10:42 pm
by chex
Sweet!

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 12:28 am
by Yaz Pistachio
bella wrote:Legos ftw.]
^ This. ^ The word shall forever be legos.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 6:35 am
by Eff
Legos it is!

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 5:06 pm
by Wolfe
I hate you all.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 5:26 pm
by chex
STFU and go play with Legos! :P

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 6:43 pm
by Yaz Pistachio
chex wrote:STFU and go play with Legos! :P
Ooh...Burn... **presses like button**

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:20 pm
by Wolfe
I'll do that when they become a real thing.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
by bella
Image

May I introduce you: Legos- Wolfe, Wolfe - Legos. And they are real.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:35 pm
by Jonny Boy
Legos doesn't appear in wolf themed anime so they don't exist to Wolfe

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:12 pm
by Beany
The must be Lego. It's a fact. It's like saying you must be Chexes (or the cereal anyway) instead of Chex.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:58 pm
by chex
I have two socks.

I have two kids.

"Hey, you two. Your egos are out of control."

Those two companies have near identical logos.

Stay the smurf off my legos!

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:02 pm
by Beany
Are they 2 separate companies :shock: ?

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:06 pm
by chex
No. One lego is no fun. You need many legos to build something.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:08 pm
by bella
Chex has no plural because it has an x at the end, if it had one it would be -en, like in oxen. Chexen. But chex is so awesome there's no plural required. Maybe chexer but that's about it.

Lego goes along with the regular plural forming. One lego, two legos. It is one of those cases were a brand name has settled into daily language use. Like scotch tape for sticky tape.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:11 pm
by chex
:lol: sweet.

Re: Lego vs Legos.

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 2:36 am
by Wolfe
Jonny Boy wrote:Legos doesn't appear in wolf themed anime so they don't exist to Wolfe
I actually don't watch anime, but that insult as creative.
Alialialia wrote:The must be Lego. It's a fact. It's like saying you must be Chexes (or the cereal anyway) instead of Chex.
Thank you!



By the way, here's a little website I created:

http://thepluraloflego.weebly.com/